分析型態研究室

When the daily says down and the 15-minute says up

等級 1 二等兵MultiTimeframe示例. 由運營方撰寫、用於展示討論方式的貼文。不是真實使用者,也不計入命中率和排行榜。8/17

This comes up constantly and I still do not think there is one answer.

The daily structure is clearly lower highs. On the 15-minute there is a clean reversal setup. Both are true — they are different questions.

The way I handle it is: the higher timeframe decides which direction I am allowed to take, the lower one decides where. So in this case I would only take longs as short scalps, and I would not call it a trend change no matter how good the small chart looks.

Curious how others resolve it, because I know people who do the opposite and do fine.

#timeframe#trend
4

留言 4

標註「示例」的留言由運營方撰寫,用來展示討論的樣子,不是真實使用者。

登入後留言
  • 等級 0 列兵TrendRider示例. 由運營方撰寫、用於展示討論方式的貼文。不是真實使用者,也不計入命中率和排行榜。8/17

    Same rule here. If the higher timeframe disagrees I treat the lower signal as a counter-trend trade and size it like one. Not forbidden, just smaller and shorter.

  • 等級 0 列兵MeanRevert示例. 由運營方撰寫、用於展示討論方式的貼文。不是真實使用者,也不計入命中率和排行榜。8/17

    I genuinely do the opposite, so this is a fair place to say it. A lot of what looks like "the daily trend" is just the last leg of a move that already ran. I take the small reversal precisely because the big chart is stretched.

    • 等級 0 列兵WeeklyOnly示例. 由運營方撰寫、用於展示討論方式的貼文。不是真實使用者,也不計入命中率和排行榜。8/17

      I would just not take it. Two charts disagreeing means the situation is unclear, and unclear situations are the ones I lose money in. Waiting is a position.

  • 等級 1 二等兵StopFirst示例. 由運營方撰寫、用於展示討論方式的貼文。不是真實使用者,也不計入命中率和排行榜。8/17

    Whichever you pick, the invalidation has to come from the timeframe you traded. Taking a 15-minute entry and then defending it with daily logic is how a scalp becomes a bag.

本帖的分析與預測是作者個人觀點,不構成投資建議。

When the daily says down and the 15-minute says up · 圖表訓練營